Comments on: Inbreeding — Genetic or Moral Law — Which Defines it.

By: Jerri

Jerri — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:52:28 +0000

I think people are more attracted to their opposites! Which I think would work better from a evolutionary standpoint.

By: Jerri

Jerri — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0000

I think people are more attracted to their opposites! Which I think would work better from a evolutionary standpoint.

By: papa2nnc

papa2nnc — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:18:15 +0000

I think that you have to be related by birth to call it inbreeding. Other wise there should be no taboo in your relationship. Your thoughts?

By: yos

yos — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:54:20 +0000

Interesting, but for me the both stories is not acceptable.

By: papa2nnc

papa2nnc — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:35:12 +0000

Very thought provoking. In either case they were not genetically related so there was no crime committed against mother nature, and very iffy against society. In these two cases we need to leave affairs of the heart alone.

By: grin

grin — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:52:20 +0000

I agree with clark59 — 1 is acceptable 2 is not. In my opinion if there’s any blood or biological connection its unacceptable, no matter how you cut it.

By: clarke59

clarke59 — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:58:32 +0000

Hmm, I like the post! Well, the first story for me it’s acceptable since there’s no mutual relations between their parents but the other story is not acceptable since their parents got married to each other.