<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Team &#8211; Please Implement Authenticated RSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creeva.com/2009/02/25/google-reader-team-please-implement-authenticated-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creeva.com/2009/02/25/google-reader-team-please-implement-authenticated-rss/</link>
	<description>My life unfolding and being told online - 1 byte of information at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: creeva</title>
		<link>http://creeva.com/2009/02/25/google-reader-team-please-implement-authenticated-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-16726</link>
		<dc:creator>creeva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creeva.com/?p=4337#comment-16726</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you need to give reader (or more appropriately someone you trust that might use google reader) your password in the first place?   There are a few places where I have created content and would like to get it out, but I can&#039;t due to the RSS feed being password protected. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If google reader allowed you to enter in a username and password, it wouldn&#039;t necessarily allow google to spider your content unless someone broke your ring of trust and put in there. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s ok for other third party to aggregators that do support it, then strip out the feed and republish it to google reader, but it&#039;s not ok for google reader to do this directly?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I have a username and password to get at your content in one manner, I can repurpose it to roogle reader anytime I want - I&#039;m just trying to save myself a couple interim steps - thank you for stopping by.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much love,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The author and one of the people that just wants his own content to be to use how he likes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#39;t you need to give reader (or more appropriately someone you trust that might use google reader) your password in the first place?   There are a few places where I have created content and would like to get it out, but I can&#39;t due to the RSS feed being password protected. </p>
<p>If google reader allowed you to enter in a username and password, it wouldn&#39;t necessarily allow google to spider your content unless someone broke your ring of trust and put in there. </p>
<p>It&#39;s ok for other third party to aggregators that do support it, then strip out the feed and republish it to google reader, but it&#39;s not ok for google reader to do this directly?</p>
<p>If I have a username and password to get at your content in one manner, I can repurpose it to roogle reader anytime I want &#8211; I&#39;m just trying to save myself a couple interim steps &#8211; thank you for stopping by.</p>
<p>Much love,</p>
<p>The author and one of the people that just wants his own content to be to use how he likes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://creeva.com/2009/02/25/google-reader-team-please-implement-authenticated-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-16725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creeva.com/?p=4337#comment-16725</guid>
		<description>Dear Google Reader team, please don&#039;t implement authenticated feeds.  We don&#039;t want you spidering our content.   Despite creeva&#039;s offer to sneak you in, your advertisers have no right to get to our users.  Why yes, we do know about robots.txt, but that&#039;s why we will keep our content on our site under its protection, thanks.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much Love,&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The people who put passwords up to keep their feeds from being indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Google Reader team, please don&#39;t implement authenticated feeds.  We don&#39;t want you spidering our content.   Despite creeva&#39;s offer to sneak you in, your advertisers have no right to get to our users.  Why yes, we do know about robots.txt, but that&#39;s why we will keep our content on our site under its protection, thanks.  </p>
<p>Much Love,</p>
<p>The people who put passwords up to keep their feeds from being indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creeva</title>
		<link>http://creeva.com/2009/02/25/google-reader-team-please-implement-authenticated-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-16579</link>
		<dc:creator>creeva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creeva.com/?p=4337#comment-16579</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you need to give reader (or more appropriately someone you trust that might use google reader) your password in the first place?   There are a few places where I have created content and would like to get it out, but I can&#039;t due to the RSS feed being password protected. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If google reader allowed you to enter in a username and password, it wouldn&#039;t necessarily allow google to spider your content unless someone broke your ring of trust and put in there. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s ok for other third party to aggregators that do support it, then strip out the feed and republish it to google reader, but it&#039;s not ok for google reader to do this directly?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I have a username and password to get at your content in one manner, I can repurpose it to roogle reader anytime I want - I&#039;m just trying to save myself a couple interim steps - thank you for stopping by.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much love,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The author and one of the people that just wants his own content to be to use how he likes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#39;t you need to give reader (or more appropriately someone you trust that might use google reader) your password in the first place?   There are a few places where I have created content and would like to get it out, but I can&#39;t due to the RSS feed being password protected. </p>
<p>If google reader allowed you to enter in a username and password, it wouldn&#39;t necessarily allow google to spider your content unless someone broke your ring of trust and put in there. </p>
<p>It&#39;s ok for other third party to aggregators that do support it, then strip out the feed and republish it to google reader, but it&#39;s not ok for google reader to do this directly?</p>
<p>If I have a username and password to get at your content in one manner, I can repurpose it to roogle reader anytime I want &#8211; I&#39;m just trying to save myself a couple interim steps &#8211; thank you for stopping by.</p>
<p>Much love,</p>
<p>The author and one of the people that just wants his own content to be to use how he likes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://creeva.com/2009/02/25/google-reader-team-please-implement-authenticated-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-16578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creeva.com/?p=4337#comment-16578</guid>
		<description>Dear Google Reader team, please don&#039;t implement authenticated feeds.  We don&#039;t want you spidering our content.   Despite creeva&#039;s offer to sneak you in, your advertisers have no right to get to our users.  Why yes, we do know about robots.txt, but that&#039;s why we will keep our content on our site under its protection, thanks.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much Love,&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The people who put passwords up to keep their feeds from being indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Google Reader team, please don&#39;t implement authenticated feeds.  We don&#39;t want you spidering our content.   Despite creeva&#39;s offer to sneak you in, your advertisers have no right to get to our users.  Why yes, we do know about robots.txt, but that&#39;s why we will keep our content on our site under its protection, thanks.  </p>
<p>Much Love,</p>
<p>The people who put passwords up to keep their feeds from being indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

